.jpg)
WHAT IS THE POSITION WITH CLONES
The subject of Clones and NPC’s (non player character) being a possible
part of humanity has raised interest but perhaps not to the extent we
would have imagined. That may be because it is very hard to find any
valid information in the minefield of possibilities. If it is true there
could be soul-less people in the human population, it would be fair to
say that could include acquaintances and perhaps even friends and
family. A clone could technically be called a computer system with the
traits of the original DNA. We may need to think past limited ideas of
DNA collection only being a recent thing obtained from blood tests,
covid testing and ancestry tracing companies, etc. Cloning may have been
occurring for ages with clones sourced from DNA of people who died long
ago. If it’s been going on for some time, we’d expect cloning techniques
to be perfected by now. We’ve seen videos and images that have shown
clones as subject to glitches but perhaps this is misleading. Perhaps
glitches are only likely to occur in hurried clone creations needed to
act as replacements for known people. NPC’s are perhaps a different
area, perhaps more like a hologram and definitely with no soul.
We also have the situation of clones mating with humans and producing
hybrid children. As well, it seems we have hybrid children arising from
a human and other soul species. A reptilian race that are more advanced
than the ‘greys’ who operate with a key controller, similar to a hive of
bees.
As we know, global population figures are always estimates of the UN and
World Bank relying on censuses, registrations, etc and not on actual
headcount. Some countries have detailed records, others have big gaps.
If cloning was happening at scale (millions or more), it could inflate
the official population well beyond the actual number of soul humans. If
it turned out that half the population were clones, there would need to
have been a massive, organized infrastructure sustaining their
introduction, identities, and integration. It would also mean that
social systems such as housing and food demand could be from artificial
population expansion.
If it turns out that clones have been created for the last 100 years and
can reproduce, then each generation would mix clone DNA into the general
population and after 4 or 5 generations, their lineage would be widely
diffused and maybe impossible to separate those coming from a ‘clone
line’ and the ‘natural genetic line’, unless the cloning process left
some detectable marker. There will be differences between humans and
clones, but perhaps not as obvious as we’d imagine. Because cloned DNA
is still human DNA, the only real distinction would be soul-presence.
Outwardly, after 100 years of inbreeding, the clone-origin individuals
would be indistinguishable from the rest of humanity.
If half the planet were clone-derived, on the surface they would
probably look and act human enough to pass unnoticed, especially if they
had DNA-driven personalities and social programming. And energetically,
only the really sensitive humans might feel an emptiness, lack of depth
or an absence of soul resonance. It is said that clones have a more
limited range of emotions but humans also have repressed emotions and
behaviour problems arising from past traumas/autism, etc, so a lack of
emotion doesn’t necessarily mean a clone. And something else that needs
to be taken into account is that many souls are now shifting from human
emotional responses to a higher vibrational spiritual compassion, which
is not so visible.
A key factor is whether souls choose to incarnate into clone hybrid
offspring and are unconcerned with this differentiation. If souls freely
incarnate into hybrid children, then clones will just be part of the
human mix, and most descendants today would have souls. Clone purity
would dissolve quickly. Newer clones would need to follow that same
integration for future generations. If souls avoid clone lineages, we
may have parallel populations of soul and non soul humans. Over a
century, depending on fertility and social mixing, that could grow into
a sizable minority.
What would be the differences between humans with souls and
human DNA derived clones?
Humans with a Soul.
A soul-infused human carries a presence that feels unmistakably alive,
as though a spark shines through them and makes you sense they are truly
there. Their emotions are authentic, layered, and nuanced, often
surprising even themselves as they grow from life’s experiences. Within,
they maintain an inner dialogue, wrestling with doubts, paradoxes, and
questions of meaning, while reflecting on past choices and reimagining
future possibilities. This inner voice becomes a moral compass, drawing
them toward fairness, compassion, and truth, even if not followed
flawlessly.
Such a person’s creativity carries originality, emerging as fresh
inspiration rather than mere recombination of what they have absorbed.
They are capable of awe and wonder, moved deeply by beauty, mystery, or
love, and these moments expand their inner world. Relationships with
them can be transformative, awakening something deeper in those they
connect with. They can introspect, doubt, and creatively re-envision
life in ways that feel alive, unpredictable, and growth-filled. Love
expressed by such a being carries depth, reciprocity, and presence,
rather than being confined to gestures alone. In their company, one
feels seen at a soul level, warmed by their capacity for wonder,
compassion, and originality.
Humans without a Soul.
By contrast, a being without a soul may have emotions that although
visible, may seem imitative, patterned, or shallow - more like learned
responses than genuine inner processes. Though able to reason, analyze,
and replay conditioned patterns, rarely posing or examining, and do not
reveal the spark of original inner questioning or the paradoxical
struggles of conscience. Deep self-awareness, moral reflection, higher
intuition, and a drive for spiritual meaning are absent, leaving them
emotionally shallow, and empathy, wonder and awe are largely missing.
There is a tendency to align closely with consensus reality and adhere
mainly to social norms.
Their ethical compass is guided by external codes - laws, cultural
expectations, or social approval - rather than any inner sense of sacred
right or wrong. They tend to be disconnected from the natural world,
showing little curiosity about nature, the stars, inner worlds, or
metaphysical questions. Though able to reason, their logic is often
time-bound, unable to grasp timeless or multidimensional truths.
In relationships, they can mimic affection, perform rituals of care, and
even provide companionship, yet the connection rarely ignites deeper
spiritual resonance and soulful reciprocity. Expressions of love -
whether through touch, words, or acts of service - can feel patterned
and treated as a transaction, missing the depth of presence that
transforms connection. They do not engage in true inner wrestling or
moral struggle, and their lives show little evidence of authentic growth
or spiritual curiosity. Over time, their presence can feel more like
that of a sophisticated actor - convincing, but not transformative. The
absence of genuine inner dialogue, soulful reflection, and
multidimensional awareness marks them as hollow imitations rather than
fully alive beings.
If the population did consist of many clones, it would also mean Earth’s
energetic balance of compassion, creativity and awakening, would be
carried by fewer souls than we assume. The true soul population would
then be smaller, but their role in holding a higher consciousness and
light for Earth would be greater.
I don’t know what the best way to handle this is. It may not require our
attention or energy input. Perhaps just living in the present, with love
and non judgment, we can deal with whatever arises. We probably all know
people who are clones who are great people and even good friends. Of
course, there will also be clones who create harm, with original
programming that ensures such behaviour. We’ve all met people who seem
unable to hear others' views or change fixed ideas. Some may be clones
and some may be just dumbed down, abused and downtrodden humans with no
fight left. There are also quite a few souls who choose to continue with
3D experiences to gain further growth and therefore waking up does not
serve that goal. So, we don’t know who is and who isn’t - and the
question is does it matter? Perhaps we only need to be aware that if we
chose a cloned individual as a partner, we may not ever receive a truly
deep intimate exchange of love.
I expect there are clones who are lovely dads, mums, children and
grandparents who are now part of society. Perhaps we can accept them as
they are, and trust the higher plan of divine order and give our energy
to increasing planetary light. It will all work out in the end.
Love,
Sandy Stevenson
9.9.2025
Regarding NPC’s, as mentioned in my earlier article ‘The quiet design of
human evolution,’ there are two different types of NPC.
One group are a benevolent multitude that while appearing to be human,
sustain life from a higher collective oversoul consciousness, as opposed
to being individual souls. Most act as a stabilizing background holding
the structure of society together, while humanity learns through the
experiences it creates. The other type is engineered to suit dark
agendas, also appearing human but often betrayed by physical defects or
behaviour. Both types have no soul. These two types are both different
than when another species who have individual souls inhabit human form.
All NPC’s will continue to carry out their functions until no longer
being needed or with the darker agenda NPC’s will come to a natural end
when unable to function in increasing light frequency.
Important point to note regarding the awakening on Earth.
Where no soul is present, there is nothing to be awakened!
Love.
Shantarn
26.12.25
I’ve noticed
a few people around me who I’ve come to think of as NPCs. While they are
lovely, kind-hearted, and helpful people with full emotional lives,
there are certain shared traits that set them apart. Of course, they
have no idea they fit this mold; to them, their experience is the
baseline.
The defining
characteristic is a complete absence of deep, contemplative thought. For
most people, a curious question acts as a spark for a conversation. If I
ask, 'I’ve often wondered why people say ‘bless you’ when someone
sneezes?' a typical response might be a minute of mulling it over or
offering a guess. With an NPC, 'I never thought about that' is the
beginning and end of the interaction.
It doesn’t
matter how varied the topic is; if it requires stepping outside of a
fixed belief system to examine a new idea, the process just doesn't
trigger. They don’t seem to notice that everyone else in the room is
engaging in a deeper level of inquiry, nor does it bother them. When
pushed on why they’ve never wondered about these things, the standard 'I
don't know' is offered without any further curiosity.
I also notice
a consistent 'parroting' of information, particularly from TV. You can
explain why a certain report is inaccurate and provide convincing proof,
which they seem to acknowledge in the moment, only to hear them repeat
the original, debunked information as an absolute fact to someone else
ten minutes later.
Sandy