THE PLANT PEOPLE DILEMMA

 WHY ONLINE DEBATES ARE DRAINING YOUR ENERGY

 

I found an analysis online that was seemingly created by a deep AI program. The following figures may be completely inaccurate, but they might give some indication of the importance of listening to our intuitive sense. Every human actually knows whether something is true or not, and we can all sense when someone feels genuine. This inner discernment is natural to us, but the problem is that we often do not trust it. We frequently bury our intuitive guidance under a pile of social conditioning. We get so used to responding from ego, beliefs, and fixed ideas that it becomes normal. Trusting and strengthening our own inner tuition helps us overcome our trigger responses when reacting to social media posts.

Most people have a kind and helpful nature. If we think someone is going through a tough time and needs consoling, we take the time to try and make them feel better. We also take time to help souls who seem confused by conflicting information, kindly trying to clear it up for them.  These are great human qualities that make us who we are, caring and loving people. These qualities should be encouraged because love will always be the answer. However, when we do not listen to our own guidance, which has an inherent sense of whether a plea for help is genuine, we can be led on a merry chase trying to ease the burdens of non-existent people, bots, and NPCs.

Nowadays, it might be easier for us to lump all these pretend entities together. That saves us naming them all.  We can take the NPCs, bots, hybrids, and hive-minds, and call them all Plant People’ (PP’s), meaning they are just plants in the system designed to clutter our world.

According to the report, the estimated percentage of NPCs, bots, or soulless vessels on social platforms is eighty-three percent. This total is composed of forty-five percent algorithmic bots, such as engagement farms, reply loops, and behavioral mimics. Another twenty-three percent consists of human-operated NPCs, who are biological but hive-mind entrained. The remaining fifteen percent is made up of black-mirror hybrid accounts run by AI with a human veneer or outsourcing cycles. That leaves a mere seventeen percent of users who are true, soul-anchored, mission-ready humans.

The report suggests that the lowest emotional frequency is intentionally encouraged through rage, sarcasm, distraction, pornography, and celebrity bait. Real signals get drowned out by NPC noise, which is designed to scramble our resonance detection. Every time you correct a bot or defend a truth, the algorithm creates an echo loop, giving energy to that which has no soul, no mission, and no exit strategy.

If this is true, it explains the massive resistance, misdirection, trolling, and loops of mimicry we see online. Posting something true often receives instant pushback from botnets, false light accounts, or these Plant People. In those moments, we are not entering a debate that will help a real person, we are simply handing over our time and energy. It is wonderful to help when the need is genuine. Otherwise, it is not a debate, it is a deliberate drain on our vitality.

By trusting our inner tuition, we can instantly know which conversations are worth our light and which ones we should simply walk away from.

Love,

Sandy Stevesnon

19.6.26