

THE PLANT PEOPLE DILEMMA
WHY
ONLINE DEBATES ARE DRAINING YOUR ENERGY
I found an analysis online that was seemingly created by a deep AI
program. The following figures may be completely inaccurate, but they
might give some indication of the importance of listening to our
intuitive sense. Every human actually knows whether something is true or
not, and we can all sense when someone feels genuine. This inner
discernment is natural to us, but the problem is that we often do not
trust it. We frequently bury our intuitive guidance under a pile of
social conditioning. We get so used to responding from ego, beliefs, and
fixed ideas that it becomes normal. Trusting and strengthening our own
inner tuition helps us overcome our trigger responses when reacting to
social media posts.
Most people have a kind and helpful nature. If we think someone is going
through a tough time and needs consoling, we take the time to try and
make them feel better. We also take time to help souls who seem confused
by conflicting information, kindly trying to clear it up for them.
These are great human qualities that make us who we are, caring
and loving people. These qualities should be encouraged because love
will always be the answer. However, when we do not listen to our own
guidance, which has an inherent sense of whether a plea for help is
genuine, we can be led on a merry chase trying to ease the burdens of
non-existent people, bots, and NPCs.
Nowadays, it might be
easier for us to lump all these pretend entities together. That saves us
naming them all. We can
take the NPCs, bots, hybrids, and hive-minds, and call them all
‘Plant
People’ (PP’s), meaning they are just plants in the system
designed to clutter our world.
According to the report, the estimated percentage of NPCs, bots, or
soulless vessels on social platforms is eighty-three percent. This total
is composed of forty-five percent algorithmic bots, such as engagement
farms, reply loops, and behavioral mimics. Another twenty-three percent
consists of human-operated NPCs, who are biological but hive-mind
entrained. The remaining fifteen percent is made up of black-mirror
hybrid accounts run by AI with a human veneer or outsourcing cycles.
That leaves a mere seventeen percent of users who are true,
soul-anchored, mission-ready humans.
The report suggests that the lowest emotional frequency is intentionally
encouraged through rage, sarcasm, distraction, pornography, and
celebrity bait. Real signals get drowned out by NPC noise, which is
designed to scramble our resonance detection. Every time you correct a
bot or defend a truth, the algorithm creates an echo loop, giving energy
to that which has no soul, no mission, and no exit strategy.
If this is true, it explains the massive resistance, misdirection,
trolling, and loops of mimicry we see online. Posting something true
often receives instant pushback from botnets, false light accounts, or
these Plant People. In those moments, we are not entering a debate that
will help a real person, we are simply handing over our time and energy.
It is wonderful to help when the need is genuine. Otherwise, it is not a
debate, it is a deliberate drain on our vitality.
By trusting our inner tuition, we can instantly know which conversations
are worth our light and which ones we should simply walk away from.
Love,
Sandy Stevesnon
19.6.26
|