DISCERNMENT IN THE TRUTHER COMMUNITY

Quite some discernment is needed with Telegram and other social media posts. We’re aware that people were already set up ahead of this awakening, specifically to undermine those working for the light. Some were well known figures in the truther community, including a few originally good people who were removed and replaced by dark hats, while others were completely unknown. But in addition to those, there are still many plants intent on planting seeds of doubt. Over time, people catch on to this and leave their platforms. They actively join multiple channels, sticking around wherever they’re allowed to stay and where their views go virtually unchallenged. While it’s not always easy to spot them, many are blatantly obvious with their highly negative posts. Even their more subtle posts are clearly designed to cause conflict and doubt.

When I see posts clearly meant to undermine, I wonder why they get a response so often. I’m not talking about posts of genuine confusion that we all go through at times and seek clarity, or the temporary dips of doubt we experience before we see the whole picture. I’m talking about posts with a clear intent to trigger a sense of loss, dampen spirits, cause distrust, stir up emotions of anger or frustration, manipulate agreement with their view, or push people to question if they’ve got it all wrong. These people quickly adapt to that audience and change the form of content.

There are many instances where it is only between the same two or three people, a setup between them to keep dark energy running. Some good channels with a huge following have actually collapsed from that one issue, resulting in thousands of people abandoning the channel.

I can understand responses to subtle negative content that require thoughtful discernment to spot it, but wonder what factors are involved when responding to highly negative posts. Perhaps it comes from an innocent desire to help straighten them out, thinking a different view might create a breakthrough. Or maybe they think it was accidental, and the person just needs to realize how negative they’re being. Another possibility is the person is isolated or lonely, with little other social interaction. We know some people visit the shops when they don’t need to, and book doctor appointments just for the chance to interact. Let us hope that one day soon, that kind of isolation no longer exists and we all work together in society.

Maybe some do it because they enjoy drama, or think it’s fun, completely unaware their response is feeding negative energy into the channel. Ultimately, that adds to the collective consciousness of humanity, because we are all connected.

And perhaps there is no consideration of the karmic aspect of causing harm. Some will wonder how such an action could possibly cause harm. It happens by feeding the negative energy of that channel, or by causing people to experience doubt and abandon a path that was meant to help them break free from the matrix. We could say it is each person's responsibility how they take things, and that is true. But responsibility belongs to both the sender and the receiver. Karma, also known as the Law of Cause and Effect, is a personal responsibility regarding the real impact of our words and actions. Even aside from karma, creating an imbalance of energy is something we eventually have to address within ourselves.

We are all working toward the creation of a new era of light, so we don’t want to impede that progress by contributing to the density. We now need to remain discerning in all things, making sure our contributions always elevate rather than diminish.

Love,

Sandy Stevenson

19.5.26